Shingrix

🚨SHINGLES VACCINE WARNING: SV40 Promoter, Black Box for Paralysis & 11X More Shingles After the Shot. SHINGRIX VACCINE – THE FACTS THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE. This vaccine is manufactured in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells using an SV40 promoter — the same controversial element that raised alarms decades ago. FDA has issued a Black Box Warning: it can trigger Guillain-Barré Syndrome — a polio-like paralysis. A 2025 study showed an 11X increase in actual shingles cases within 21 days of the shot. Ingredients include: • GMO mRNA gE antigen grown in CHO cells • AS01B adjuvant • MPL (from Salmonella cell walls) • QS-21 • Polysorbate 80 • Host cell proteins & DNA Documented post-marketing side effects: Guillain-Barré, Lupus, Gout, Arthritis, Neuropathy, Myalgia, Optic Neuropathy, Autoimmune disease, Pneumonia, Death, and more. Anaphylaxis and fainting are also listed. Why risk injecting lab-grown material with known dangers when Nature already gives us a proven way to heal shingles permanently? My husband had a brutal Shingles outbreak in 2016. ER offered only painkillers and warned of months or permanent nerve pain. Instead, we used a simple Carnivore/Lion Diet + targeted supplements for permanent internal healing + blister treating external remedies. Pain gone, blisters dried, back to work in 10 days — ZERO lingering nerve damage because we treated the root cause of Lysine/Arginine imbalance. Nature always provides the real cure. Food is medicine. Vaccines cause harm. Question everything. Protect your family. Share this.

@briangerard13 Very. All we can do is what we can do. Yes, Shingrix not only prevents Shingles, but interestingly, reduces the risk of dementia by a significant percentage too. And it seems to have other anti aging properties. Same with Pneumovax and several other vaccines. Miraculous findings

More vaccine disinformation. 1. "SV40 promoter" — FALSE AS STATED Shingrix uses a recombinant protein produced in genetically modified Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. The expression of this protein is controlled by the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, not the SV40 promoter. The SV40 promoter is used in some other CHO-cell manufacturing contexts as a selectable marker system, which is likely where the confusion (or deliberate conflation) originates. No SV40 promoter drives gE antigen expression in Shingrix. The finished vaccine contains a purified protein, not the manufacturing cell line's DNA or promoter sequences. Additionally, the claim that Shingrix contains "GMO mRNA" is simply wrong — Shingrix is a recombinant protein subunit vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine. 2. "Black box warning for paralysis" — REAL BUT GROTESQUELY DISTORTED The FDA warning is real, but the framing is designed to terrify. The FDA evaluated post-marketing observational data and determined that the results show an association of GBS with Shingrix, but that available evidence is insufficient to establish a causal relationship. The FDA stressed that "benefits of vaccination with Shingrix continue to outweigh its risks." The absolute numbers matter enormously here: an estimated three cases of GBS per million vaccinations administered in adults aged 65 and older. The increased risk appeared driven by the first dose — an estimated 6 excess cases per million doses in the 42 days following the first dose, with no increased risk of GBS after the second dose. Three to six cases per million is not "polio-like paralysis" lurking in every vial. It is an extremely rare signal that regulators are appropriately monitoring. 3. "11X more shingles after the shot" — REAL FINDING, CATASTROPHICALLY MISREPRESENTED This claim is based on an actual 2025 study, but what the post does with it is dishonest. The risk of shingles does jump 11-fold after the first dose of Shingrix — but it decreases by 73% after the second dose. Australian researchers theorized that the first shot may temporarily dampen the immune system, giving the latent varicella zoster virus a brief window to activate, causing mild cases of shingles. The study found a transient increase in shingles presentations following dose 1, with no increased risk of postherpetic neuralgia, and strong evidence of vaccine effectiveness after 2 doses. The post presents this as a reason not to vaccinate. The actual researchers present it as a reason to complete the two-dose series. The 11x figure applies to a short transient window after dose one, not to the vaccine's overall effect, which is strongly protective. 4. Ingredient fear-mongering "MPL from Salmonella cell walls" — MPL (monophosphoryl lipid A) is a purified, detoxified molecule derived from bacterial cell walls and is a well-characterized adjuvant component. The fact that it originates from a bacterial source no more makes it dangerous than penicillin being derived from mold. "QS-21" — a saponin adjuvant derived from tree bark, in clinical use for decades. "Host cell proteins & DNA" — trace residuals from manufacturing, regulated to extremely low levels by the FDA. This framing implies hamster cells are being injected. They are not. 5. The carnivore-diet— not evidence A personal anecdote about one person's shingles course is not a clinical alternative to a vaccine that demonstrated 97.2% efficacy in clinical trials. Protection against shingles and postherpetic neuralgia is sustained for at least 11 years. Shingles commonly resolves on its own in otherwise healthy people within 2–4 weeks regardless of treatment, which is almost certainly what happened here. The "Lysine/Arginine imbalance" framing is a popular wellness concept with no meaningful clinical evidence behind it as a shingles treatment. Bottom line: The vaccine prevents a disease that causes months of severe nerve pain and permanent damage in a significant minority of patients.

AVVERTENZA VACCINO CONTRO L'HERPES ZOSTER: Promotore SV40, Avvertenza Black Box per Paralisi e 11 Volte Più Herpes Zoster Dopo la Dose. VACCINO SHINGRIX – I FATTI CHE NON VOGLIONO CHE TU VEDA.

@Suzierizzo1 I had chicken pox…was considered a right of passage as a child. Gratefully I was vaccinated against measles. No sign of shingles… Shingrix at some point?

@SevenSeas8951 Nice 👏 ako din done na dyan and shingrix

@Suzierizzo1 I had chicken pox…was considered a right of passage as a child. Gratefully I was vaccinated against measles. No sign of shingles… Shingrix at some point?

@TahirihWalsh I'm under 50 and got Shingrix. I'm in so much pain and stress already that a few days of mild discomfort on top for the protection against shingles and dementia seemed worth it.

@SevenSeas8951 Nice 👏 ako din done na dyan and shingrix

@briangerard13 Very. All we can do is what we can do. Yes, Shingrix not only prevents Shingles, but interestingly, reduces the risk of dementia by a significant percentage too. And it seems to have other anti aging properties. Same with Pneumovax and several other vaccines. Miraculous findings

AVVERTENZA VACCINO CONTRO L'HERPES ZOSTER: Promotore SV40, Avvertenza Black Box per Paralisi e 11 Volte Più Herpes Zoster Dopo la Dose. VACCINO SHINGRIX – I FATTI CHE NON VOGLIONO CHE TU VEDA.

More vaccine disinformation. 1. "SV40 promoter" — FALSE AS STATED Shingrix uses a recombinant protein produced in genetically modified Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. The expression of this protein is controlled by the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, not the SV40 promoter. The SV40 promoter is used in some other CHO-cell manufacturing contexts as a selectable marker system, which is likely where the confusion (or deliberate conflation) originates. No SV40 promoter drives gE antigen expression in Shingrix. The finished vaccine contains a purified protein, not the manufacturing cell line's DNA or promoter sequences. Additionally, the claim that Shingrix contains "GMO mRNA" is simply wrong — Shingrix is a recombinant protein subunit vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine. 2. "Black box warning for paralysis" — REAL BUT GROTESQUELY DISTORTED The FDA warning is real, but the framing is designed to terrify. The FDA evaluated post-marketing observational data and determined that the results show an association of GBS with Shingrix, but that available evidence is insufficient to establish a causal relationship. The FDA stressed that "benefits of vaccination with Shingrix continue to outweigh its risks." The absolute numbers matter enormously here: an estimated three cases of GBS per million vaccinations administered in adults aged 65 and older. The increased risk appeared driven by the first dose — an estimated 6 excess cases per million doses in the 42 days following the first dose, with no increased risk of GBS after the second dose. Three to six cases per million is not "polio-like paralysis" lurking in every vial. It is an extremely rare signal that regulators are appropriately monitoring. 3. "11X more shingles after the shot" — REAL FINDING, CATASTROPHICALLY MISREPRESENTED This claim is based on an actual 2025 study, but what the post does with it is dishonest. The risk of shingles does jump 11-fold after the first dose of Shingrix — but it decreases by 73% after the second dose. Australian researchers theorized that the first shot may temporarily dampen the immune system, giving the latent varicella zoster virus a brief window to activate, causing mild cases of shingles. The study found a transient increase in shingles presentations following dose 1, with no increased risk of postherpetic neuralgia, and strong evidence of vaccine effectiveness after 2 doses. The post presents this as a reason not to vaccinate. The actual researchers present it as a reason to complete the two-dose series. The 11x figure applies to a short transient window after dose one, not to the vaccine's overall effect, which is strongly protective. 4. Ingredient fear-mongering "MPL from Salmonella cell walls" — MPL (monophosphoryl lipid A) is a purified, detoxified molecule derived from bacterial cell walls and is a well-characterized adjuvant component. The fact that it originates from a bacterial source no more makes it dangerous than penicillin being derived from mold. "QS-21" — a saponin adjuvant derived from tree bark, in clinical use for decades. "Host cell proteins & DNA" — trace residuals from manufacturing, regulated to extremely low levels by the FDA. This framing implies hamster cells are being injected. They are not. 5. The carnivore-diet— not evidence A personal anecdote about one person's shingles course is not a clinical alternative to a vaccine that demonstrated 97.2% efficacy in clinical trials. Protection against shingles and postherpetic neuralgia is sustained for at least 11 years. Shingles commonly resolves on its own in otherwise healthy people within 2–4 weeks regardless of treatment, which is almost certainly what happened here. The "Lysine/Arginine imbalance" framing is a popular wellness concept with no meaningful clinical evidence behind it as a shingles treatment. Bottom line: The vaccine prevents a disease that causes months of severe nerve pain and permanent damage in a significant minority of patients.